Skip to main content

Threalmic deadlock breaking


Truth v Justice, Justice v Freedom, Freedom v Truth

Whilst idly threalming recently, I have mulled over a possible new paradigm for navigating our chaotic civilization (as one does).

Many wayfaring pirates on today's threalmic seas have found themselves with crappy compasses and confusing charts, as most of the truths, traditions and teachings that have guided us in the past, are increasingly losing credibility and coherence under the serial scrutiny they are subjected to by the sway of spin from seductive sellers of serious style and specious substance. So I posit here a possible navigational aid to help marooned piratic souls find direction again through this increasingly befuddling fog.

How can a modern pirate find bearings in the vast tumultuous sea of isms:

alarmism, antidisestablishmentarianism, Buddhism, capitalism, cephlapodism, christianism, conservatism, communism, empiricism, environmentalism, fatalism, feminism, fundamentalism, futurism, Gaiaism, hedonism, humanism, ismism, legalism, libertarianism, materialism, nativism, nacissism, neologism, obscurantism, post-modernism, racism, rationalism, relativism, solipsism, scepticism, socialism, sophism, threalmism and Zoroastrism?

The rule of thumb set out below is a necessarily oversimplified, but satisfactorily reassuring, priority setter, to help find a way through these ismatic shoals of moral, intellectual and legal complexity.

It is built on three principles that are already well established as navigational aids. For the most part these markers have already have been placed to identify reefs, wrecks, channels, chasms, whirlpools and currents by our forebears and been repositioned, abandoned, re-designated, added to, tendered to and ignored by subsequent generations on countless voyages of discovery and pillage into meaning and coherence in history, literature, politics, art, science, law and life. But these markers are now too numerous, conflicting and confusing, and many of us need new simplified usable rules so we can again navigate meaningfully in these waters.

So here it is posited that the three interdependent markers to look out for in applying this threalmic trichotomy are ...

Truth
Freedom
Justice

Is this an Amway sales pitch? Nope. It's a life choice rule of thumb, that goes like this:

In dealing with cultural complexity, generally:

The Truth in a proposition bests its Justice;

The Justice of it bests Freedom to refute;

And Freedom to conjecture bests Truth.

This therefore purports to be a deceptively simple "scissors, paper, rock" deadlock breaker for analysing otherwise irreconcilable moral, political and cultural conflicts.

Just what "Truth", "Freedom" and "Justice" are for any person , is a matter for their own beliefs, cultural proclivities, prejudices, education and influences. Whether a person is a piratical old fraud, a believer in the one true faith, an ardent socialist, a rational economist, a post-modern posture stylist, a global warming warrior, a scientific empiricist, a narcissistic hedonist or some or all of the above, this process can still potentially help inform sound personal choices when faced with complex multi-valented information.

Each person can invest their own version of the value they attribute to each of these core principles when implementing this handy deadlock breaker. And it can be applied to almost any threalm: so whether you're sitting in the dark staring at a bigscreen, reading a doorstopper, opining on fashion, judging Idol judges, jousting with a journalist, communing with a pod, analysing scrum penalties, creating a sauce, planning a trip, positioning a bush or composing a blog post; you can calibrate your assessment through this prism:

FREEDOM bests TRUTH

TRUTH bests JUSTICE,

JUSTICE bests FREEDOM,

If there is to be any buy-in for this then a threalmer must acknowledge or suspend disbelief enough to accept that these interacting core principles are indeed wrestling for resolution in most engagements with our multi-mediated universe. And a case has to made that it is possible to ethically and satisfactorily reconcile these three core principles by the application of this rule of thumb. But if these small hurdles can be overcome, it might yet be a minor but usable enhancement to the craft of living in the contemporary threalmic condition.

Are these three principles at the core of civilized threalmic engagement with the universe? Are they sufficiently comprehensive to be useful? Hell it seems that it is actually seeking to set a pre-ordained balance between moral, epistemological and situational imperatives (Phew!).

A wee grand surely? Yes, but for now these slightly problematic issues are to be postponed for future posts and comment. Today, this threalmic deadlock breaker is simply posited for maturation and exposure to sunlight.

I am hopeful that further exploration and exposition, might yet transform the pleasingly symmetrical proposition that:

Justice bests Freedom

Freedom bests Truth

Truth bests Justice

into a cultural navigational aid that has some merit. We'll see.

There is a little work ahead on this. If it crosses their ken at all (which seems unlikely), these superficial speculations would be dismissed out of hand by cultural absolutists of all stripes and also by the Popperian hordes . But I do acknowledge, to the extent that I am able, for I am only a rank poseur on this, that there is an element in these agricultural speculations, that scratches a niggle of doubt that the great Karl Popper might have not quite got his cloth completely whole with his prescriptions on scientific rationalism, especially for us mere cultural wayfarers. So I can, for the time being anyway, blithely pursue yet one more poorly intellectually resourced attempt to re-inject a little of Adam Smith's innate "moral sentiment" into the ongoing cultural distillation process. I purport to do this by giving (using convenient labels for illustrative purposes only) Smith's "Justice" a role between Popper's "Truth" and Hayek's "Freedom". It instinctively feels like injecting such an element into the balance could give our navigation of the cultural deluge more points of traction for us confused threalmic rubes, who otherwise feel quite unnourished from the dry scientific emptiness of the vast weight of falsifiable conjectures, or from the dubious absolutisms of true believers.

But even, as seems likely, this attempt stalls at birth, this thread of threalm has already refracted some new perspectives. And further examination could even yet throw up additional fancied insights into the mystery.

Bob

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Jackson, martyr ?

. Someone has to die for their beliefs to be a martyr . Drudge pointed to headlines last Friday saying that Jackson's was a " Death by Showbusines s". So in the sense that Jackson seems to have died for his belief in celebrity, yes, he might be called a martyr. I never got Michael Jackson. Thriller didn't thrill me at all ( Now Noel Coward, that's another story ). But I did get a bit of a kick from seeing others get him. He was boppy and catchy and slick, as well as monumentally fluffy and hugely impaired. What I struggle with is the apparently massive consequentiality of fluffiness and impairment like Jackson's. What is the fuss about the passing of a semi-talented song and dance weirdo from decades past? Boris Johnson, the London Mayor, has had a stab at explaining it to we mystified souls who struggle to get with the programme. He reckons it's just like Princess Di. And I agree, to the extent that I was almost as unprepared for and dumbfounded by th

Today's Woke guide to Gender, Race and Climate

Gender, Race and Climate. These are the big ideas that matter in the 21st century. So get with the Zeitgeist folks.  You gotta go woke. As I understand the current, constantly changing, received progressive position on these big 3 topics, here's what we're supposed to think and believe: Gender : A person can be whatever gender they want to be. Anyone who thinks or says otherwise commits a crime against humanity. Race : Only blacks, the indigenous and people of colour can have and express legitimate views on blacks, people of colour and indigenous issues. Any white person doing so is a racist, wrongly appropriating the exclusive privilege of disadvantaged victims. Accordingly it is wrong for a non-BIPOC person to believe or, worse, say that all races are equal and that we should never discriminate against any person on the basis of race. This is because a non-BIPOC person cannot understand racial prejudice because they have not experienced negative racial discrimination and beca

Perpetual pretenders proclaiming possession of Truth ... (fact check the fat cheque)

Samizdata.net  have pointed me to an article in Public entitled " Nacissism of the Fact Checkers ". It's a sobering though disturbingly unsurprising read.  It adds to the litany of distressingly wrong facts that have been endorsed and perpetuated by the "official narrative" and with the reciprocal suppression or censorship of correct "falsehoods".  Here's a list of such behaviours by fact checkers from the article: - calling out a self avowed parody site for misinformation on the Paris riots for posting a typically over the top clip from the action movie "Fast & Furious"; -  that claim by the New York Times, AP and the BBC that fake news travels 6 times faster than the factual news, turns out to be fake news itself. The claim is based on a single MIT study on small number of tweets , not news. - Facebook removing 20 million posts, and labeling 190 million posts about Covid-19 as "content moderation" because those posts did